- Where does handbrake for mac store presets install#
- Where does handbrake for mac store presets pro#
- Where does handbrake for mac store presets software#
But last time I investigated (a couple years ago), it wasn't just slightly increased disk usage that was the issue - the quality of the file was really bad. On the Studio, that's all changed, it's still fast but reliable good quality output can now also be had with a decent CQ setting.Ĭlick to expand.The performance of VTB is incredible.
Where does handbrake for mac store presets pro#
VTB on my old Mac Pro was fast but the output was pants and not worth the effort.
Where does handbrake for mac store presets software#
it's fine with live action but rarely compresses cartoons at all well (no idea why not, maybe a lower CQ setting could be used, I just simply use software H.265 10-bit for them), but the FPS is the same ilk for both live action and cartoon. Don't take the size part of the BBB test encodes as realistic, it appears the VTB H.265 10-bit encoder doesn't do cartoons very well. The Apple Silicon version of FFmpeg also supports the VTB CQ setting.Ħ10fps isn't something to be sniffed at at the cost of slightly increased disk usage. While the VTB CQ setting has no relation to the software RF setting, the two are not transferable, it can be tuned to provide very good output at the cost of a slight increase in file size (though the output size is still generally way less than half the H.264 source). VTB now provides (on Apple Silicon) a constant quality control capability, on both your bits of kit, your only control is the bitrate (I think).
I've also included the VTB H.265 10-bit times simply because the enhanced media engine in the Max/Ultra is worth investigating. I've included the H.265 10-bit, simply because I much prefer its output vs the 8-bit, it's slightly slower but IMHO worth the extra time. Perhaps I need to start investigating GPU dependent video encoding. Likely, if my workflow were more GPU dependent, I'd be more impressed. In my imagination, I was expecting the Max to just trounce my current set up. Even if the Max were capable of that same kind of Ultra speed, I'd be disappointed. But even your Ultra, running the snapshot, is "only" 16% faster than my 9700K. I guess my next step is to go back to the Apple store and run the same test with the snapshot build. There'd be other benefits to having a Studio Max vs my hackintosh, but raw speed doesn't appear to be one of them. I'm having a hard time justifying $3K for a Max machine that won't be faster for my most demanding tasks. Too bad I don't have the money for the Ultra. Possibly, likely at best, the Max would also receive the 12% bump using the snapshot build, which would put it at 57 fps - which is still not where I'd want it. There does seem to be a noticeable boost in the snapshot build.ħ9.84 vs 71.44 fps for the 8 bit software H.265ġ2% faster ain't earth shattering, but it's significant. Much thanks for taking a substantial amount of time to run all those tests. If anyone with an M1 Max Studio has a spare six minutes (or hopefully much less) I'd really appreciate it. It'd be nice to have the "Is it faster?" question already answered. However, that 14 day return window is already going to be kind of tight as I'd be testing a lot of new software as I'd be dumping lots of legacy applications.
My next step would probably be to buy one and return it within 14 days if it weren't significantly faster that my current set up. I rarely, if ever, use Handbrake, but it's similar enough to much of my workflow (FFmpeg software video encodes) that the results are relevant. But I was expecting the M1 Max to be way faster. Could someone with an M1 Max Studio repeat the same test? The Apple Store was really busy and it didn't seem right to hog the machine for another six minutes as I'd already been using it for 15.Īt some point relatively soon, I need to go "legit" as I can't stay on Mojave indefinitely. Is there a known issue with Handbrake and the M1 Max? I searched and found some supposed issues from when the M1 (not Max or Pro) was first introduced, but I can't find a definitive answer. It took 4:38 to finish with an average speed of 68.66 FPS.ĭuring the test at the Apple Store, I had Activity Monitor open the entire time and it looks like Handbrake was using ≈ 830-50% CPU time during the encode. (I did not think to see how many GPU cores, but as the test was a software encode, it shouldn't matter much)ĩ700K 5 GHz, 32 GB, macOS 10.14.6, Handbrake 1.5.1 It took 6:17 to finish with an average speed of 50.76 FPS. I took a screenshot of the results and went back home to test the same file on my four year-old 9700K Hackintosh. While standing there for a few minutes, it seemed kind of slow. Per Handbrake's benchmarking suggestions, I used the "Big Buck Bunny 1080p30" file for a software encode using "Fast 1080p30" and H.265.
Where does handbrake for mac store presets install#
Just got back from the Apple Store where they kindly let me install Handbrake and encode a file on a Studio M1 Max.
0 kommentar(er)
